Hi Amal,
Good Day!
I am planning to take this exam C_PXSUP_90. Please help me with any material or question bank.
chandrasekhar
Re: Support Consultant - SAP Business All-in-One certification "C_PXSUP_90"
↧
↧
Re: Blank Delivery Date at PO Creation
Oh yes you are right - i was doing a test with a PR. But I am trying with plant input manually also but still the same problem.
↧
Re: MDG 7.0 Add-on after installation of EHP6
Hello,
Q-1 Yes.
Q-2 Product version should be EHP6 for SAP ERP 6.0
Q-3 In order to download patches for EHP6, you should select maintenance.
Q-4 It is not present because you have not registered as a Ramp-up customer. Once, you will register for the same, you should be able to select the same in MOPZ.
Thanks,
Sunny
↧
Re: How to do the configuration to allow budget check at PO level and not PR level?
Hi Clara,
Thanks for your suggestion.
I have implemented OSS 955107 for testing. However, I am still able to create PO with tolerance of 20 USD. Any idea why?
As an example, I have budget of 1000USD and I have created the PR with 1005 USD, I am still able to proceed to create the PO with 1005 USD, I will only hit error message when I create PO with 1020 USD.
Could you please advise?
Thanks and regards,
Jessie
↧
Re: Account assignment Object XXXXXX missing error after cif in SAP APO
Hi Bala,
Transaction :ZM08 is not a standard transaction.
Also note function module /SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND triggered when you transfer the reduction of requirements (forecast consumption after PGI) from your ECC system to the SCM APO system not the material master CIF.
Coming to your error "Error during determination of the pegging area" (/SAPAPO/SALES132).
The requirements reduction is transferred to SAP APO if active Integration Models exist for Material Master Data with a suitable Material-Plant combination.
In this case, the requirements reduction is transferred for all suitable Material-Plant combinations.
The data is sent to APO although no Integration Model for Transactional Data has been activated. This causes the above error.
Activate the flag "Filter Obj. Req. Reduc." in transaction /CFC9 in your ECC system will solve this issue.Please refer SAP Knowledge base article 1705071 - Error during determination of the pegging area (/SAPAPO/SALES132).
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
↧
↧
Re: Document splitting- Item category
Hi Vinayak,
Document splitting active and making doc type mandatory for FB60 are two separate issues. If you want to default a particular doc type for FB60, you can do so by configuration and if you want to use only a particular doc type for FB60, go for FI Validation(OB28).
If you have any issues in Doc splitting with respect to Doc type.. do let us know in order to be able to give specific solution.
Regards,
Kavita
↧
Re: Emp in Same Emp Subgrp but different Shifts
Can you try shift plannig via transaction PP61?
↧
Re: Distortion of dimensions of models
Ken,
Thank you so much for the quick response. 
↧
Re: SAP Portal sniffing using HttpWatch
Hi,
Unfortunately no, the free version allows you to record the session but not to analyze it.
But.. you can also use the chrome developer tools to acheive the same thing almost.
If you open the chrome developer tools (F12) and go to the network tab, clear it and reproduce the scenario (with the developer tools open) all of the requests will be recorded and you can analyze those requests.
Also, in new IE you also have that feature but less convenient.
Best regards,
Saar
↧
↧
Re: SAP GUI 7.30 option "Hide SAP Logon(PAD) in tray bar"
Hi
we had similar issue
user want to close sap logon pad but they are not able to close until they close all open SAP session.
but SAP provided a solution with SAP gui 7.30 patch 5 onwards called "Hide SAP Logon (Pad) to Tray bar"
if you enable this option you can close the sap logon pad without ending SAP open sessions.
if your option "Hide SAP Logon (Pad) to Tray bar" is disabled you can enable it via SAP GUI configuration->SAP logon Pad Options->General here you can see this option.
if you can not modify via above said path...
you can enable by editing registry values... to do this follow as mentioned below..
regedit->HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE->software->SAP->SAPLogon->Options-- here you can add new REG_DWORD value
Note: you may not find Options key after SAPlogon key, if you don't then just create new key called Options and add the below values..
Value name should be HideToTrayBar
Value Data should be 1
I hope this helps
you can also check note 1749369 for more details
Regards
Ravi
↧
Re: Creating a File from a Internal table at a Shared Drive
Hi Eitan,
The path of shared drive is as follows
"\\KM.company_name.com\folder\subfolder\file_name.ext".
and attachments are coming as data to an internal table.
Sorry for delayed response.
Regards,
Sachin
↧
Re: how to restrict the future posting date in any material document with IFCU ,COR6n transaction
Hi Harish,
In the confirmation parameters setting in SPRO, you can prevent confirmation in future date by removing tick from "Dates in Future" check box.
Here's the customizing path: Production Planning for Process Industries - Process Order - Operations - Confirmation - Define Confirmation Parameters.
Please check and revert back.
Thanks
Regards,
Julian
↧
Re: difference between dats(char type) and date(key figure type)
Besides, you can use dats characteristics in query selection screen variables/restrictions for RKFs.
Br, H
↧
↧
Re: why my infocube is empty
Hi Masoumeh,
3.x data flow
if you run the info package you will get data form info source to traget
here don't have transformations and DTP concept and only transfer rules (update rule mapping.)
7.x data flow
if you run info packge you will get data up to PSA.
run the DTP you will get data in target
here we need transformation mapping required.
please check the below thread
What is the difference between BW 3.5 and BI 7.0?
Thanks,
Phani.
↧
No entry in V_T706F
Dear Friends
I'm facing a Issue while maintaining Travel Per Diem's flat rates for Vehicle's. Let me explain you my scenario in brief. we are currently following Flat rates for all Vehicles & its classes & we don't have any Miles/km's Limit. I've maintained the config in the following Tables V_T706F,V_T706F1,V_T702N_M, I've not mentioned any cumulation period's.
V_T706F:
V_T706F1:
V_T702N_M:
PA30 --> IT0017
Error In PR05
Kindly let me know what else need to be done, am I missing any config??? Kindly suggest!!!!
Await for your valuable Inputs
Cheers 
Pradyp
↧
Re: ship to party is differnt
Dear
but in sales order creation , in VA01-- If we give another ship to party no also which not assigned system will take right ?
↧
Re: KSPI Cost not getting Calculated
Any suggestion..as this was urgent..
↧
↧
Re: Production order confirmation issue with decimal hours
Refer this Note.
Note 1163465 - CATS WD:Unit of Measurement displayed in the internal format
↧
Does WEBI's runtime differ from HANA view?
Hi,
We have a WEBI report that fetches 16 million rows with 19 columns in 8 minutes from a .UNX universe built on a Calculated HANA view.
Calculated HANA view used by the report takes 1 minute and 2 seconds to run in HANA Studio.
Our concern here is users expect WEBI also to run in the same time as HANA (or almost in the same time range ~2 mins).
We understand that although HANA Studio executes the view in 1 minute and 2 seconds, it only renders 200 rows.
Same is the case with Universe (& WEBI Query Refresh Preview) as it too takes ~1 minute, but renders 200 rows (increasing it to 16 million in Universe causes a Java heap error)
However, the difference between WEBI and HANA view run times are minimal when we run data for less number of records (in the range of 10000)
Our questions is,
- Is it normal for WEBI to take this much time to run when HANA has completed in ~ 1 min for large data,
- If yes, please do suggest a SAP release notes or blog that we can refer and tell the users
- If no, please suggest ways to improve WEBI performance
Thanks and Regards,
Ram
↧
Re: Automate opening financial period in GL at month-end
Hi ,
There is a sdn article discussing the same please follow the link
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
